Your Views

3/2/2013

No need for entrapment

No need for entrapment

On Feb. 7, the Garden City Police Department conducted a grandiose seat belt and child safety restraint check near the Kansas and Third Street area of Garden City. This is a very busy intersection normally any time of the day or night. With the check being done at night, there could have easily been the potential of creating an accident. My question is, why couldn't a daytime check for seat belts and child seat safety have been done just as effectively by officers who are patrolling our streets daily?

This check was used to fulfill the purposes of other moving violations besides seat belt and child seat safety. This is as it should be any time one makes a stop of a vehicle. This check was done under the ruse of an officer dressed not as an officer of the law, but as a utility worker in the back of a utility truck staring down into vehicles as they passed, which drew unwarranted attention of drivers from the task of driving attentively. Later on down the street, they found themselves being pulled over. I have a word for this — entrapment. I find it disturbing and unsettling the way it was conducted. In the future when traffic lane checks are conducted, I hope our GCPD doesn't feel the need to turn it into a sideshow.

KAREN LIVINGSTON,

Garden City

A question of prejudice

In Tuesday's paper, I read the criticism made by Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor noting "a deep and sorry vein of racial prejudice ..." I also read in the same paper the account of the suspected suicide of a Garden City man while at the same time being well aware that not every suspected suicide in our area finds coverage in The Telegram. I question: is this reporting also an example of "a deep and sorry vein of racial (or ethnic/cultural) prejudice?"

THE REV. JAMES F. BAKER,

Garden City

comments powered by Disqus
I commented on a story, but my comments aren't showing up. Why?
We provide a community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day.
Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. We expect civil dialogue.
Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome.
Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum.

If you don't see your comment, perhaps you ...
... called someone an idiot, a racist, a moron, etc. Name-calling or profanity (to include veiled profanity) will not be tolerated.
... rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.
... included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.
... accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.
... made a comment in really poor taste.

MULTIMEDIA