Beef Empire Days   BED – Event Coverage Community Guide Honor Flight SW Kansas Pro-Am Youth In Excellence View Special Section PDFs
All Classifieds Jobs Real Estate Garage Sales
Food and Recipes Letters to Santa Puzzles and Games Southwest Life and Events SWKPets Pet Blog United Way Fundraising Weather
Local and National Top 10 of 2011 Preps Live SWKPrepZone.com E-Edition
Local and National Top 10 of 2011 Business News E-Edition
Recent Videos Recent Photos Recent Podcasts Podcasts-Talk of the Town

  Add Your Comment | Read (0) Comments

AP: Sierra Club wants hearing on Holcomb power plant

Published 6/23/2009 in News

TOPEKA (AP) — Environmentalists sent a letter to a state agency on Monday demanding that it hold public hearings on plans to build a new coal-fired power plant in southwest Kansas.

Earth Justice and the Kansas Sierra Club sent the letter to Kansas Department of Health and Environment Secretary Rod Bremby demanding that the public have a chance to weigh in on plans by Sunflower Electric Power Corp. to build a plant near Holcomb.

"Building a massive, new polluting coal facility will have serious long-term consequences for Kansas, and the public's voice should be heard on such an important matter," said Stephanie Cole, spokeswoman for Kansas Sierra Club.

Health Department spokeswoman Maggie Thompson said the agency received and was reviewing the letter.

"We're still reviewing it and consideration will be given to their request. That's where we are right now," Thompson said. "It's a pretty extensive letter."

In April, Gov. Mark Parkinson and Sunflower officials reached a settlement over plans to build a new plant, reducing the company's request from two plants to one 895 megawatt plant. The settlement also contains other renewable energy provisions.

The two-plant plan would have cost about $3.5 billion, though a revised estimate for the single plant hasn't been released.

Bremby, the health department secretary, denied Sunflower's initial application for two plants in 2007 over concerns about carbon dioxide emissions. He said then that the state couldn't ignore the dangers of global warming, which many scientists link to greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide.

A new application submitted by Sunflower on Friday contains revisions to reflect that it wants to build one generator, not two, but leaves some data "to be determined," including levels of emissions of pollutants.

The environmentalists' letter argues that the health department should be required to hold a public hearing before the new application and permit are approved.

Sunflower and its supporters in the Legislature tried unsuccessfully during the 2008 and 2009 sessions to push through legislation to overturn Bremby's decision. Each time the measures were vetoed by then-Gov. Kathleen Sebelius. But within days of her resignation in April, to become U.S. secretary of health and human services, Parkinson announced he and Sunflower had reached an agreement to build one new plant.

Legislators quickly approved a bill codifying the agreement, along with measures to increase wind energy and promote conservation.

"The initial agreement was made privately between Gov. Parkinson and Sunflower. We just want to have an opportunity to participate," said Cole, of the Kansas Sierra Club.

Sunflower will be allowed to build a plant with enough capacity to meet the peak electric demands of about 448,000 households. The utility agreed to take steps to offset the plant's potential carbon dioxide emissions, estimated at almost 6.7 million tons a year.

The agreement between Parkinson and the utility also calls for new transmission lines in western Kansas, which would then be used to carry power from wind farms.

Sunflower expects the power plant to take about 18 months to construct and creating about 1,500 jobs.

What do you think? Should a hearing be held? Talk about it at SWKTalk.com.

Add your Comment About This Story

Commenting Rules

The Garden City Telegram reserves the right to delete any comment it deems inappropriate. We encourage visitor comments and ask that you be brief and add something relevant to the conversation. All comments are reviewed (usually within 24 hours or less) before appearing on this website.

Read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use for full details of our policies.

Thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts.

 

captcha 1b82e69ca0c94128a57fbdf6d8380242

Found 0 comment(s)!