NBA awaits documentation of Clippers sale, still plans Sterling vote


By Mike Bresnahan

By Mike Bresnahan

Los Angeles Times

(MCT) — The NBA still wants to see some proof.

The league said it was informed by Los Angeles Clippers co-owner Shelly Sterling that an agreement was reached to sell the team for $2 billion to Steve Ballmer, but the NBA awaited one small thing _ paperwork.

Until then, the league says it plans to hold an official vote Tuesday in New York in which all 30 NBA teams can force a sale of the Clippers.

"We await the submission of necessary documentation from Mrs. Sterling," NBA spokesman Mike Bass said Friday in a statement. "In the meantime, the June 3 special meeting of the NBA Board of Governors remains as scheduled."

The NBA Advisory/Finance committee met via conference call Friday morning to discuss the Ballmer sale but it did not have the power to call it official. The committee is made up of 10 owners, including Los Angeles Lakers governor Jeanie Buss. Twenty-three of the 30 NBA owners _ a three-fourths majority _ would have to ratify the sale in a vote at a future date.

The league acknowledged that a friendly sale of the Clippers was preferable to a forced one.

"Commissioner (Adam) Silver has consistently said the preferred outcome to the Clippers proceeding would be a voluntary sale of the team," Bass said.

comments powered by Disqus
I commented on a story, but my comments aren't showing up. Why?
We provide a community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day.
Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. We expect civil dialogue.
Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome.
Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum.

If you don't see your comment, perhaps you ...
... called someone an idiot, a racist, a moron, etc. Name-calling or profanity (to include veiled profanity) will not be tolerated.
... rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.
... included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.
... accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.
... made a comment in really poor taste.