Washington Monument reopens

5/12/2014

Washington Monument reopens

Washington Monument reopens

By Lalita Clozel

Tribune Washington Bureau

WASHINGTON (MCT) — After three years of reparations, the Washington Monument reopened to the public Monday with some visible bruises, as thousands gathered to celebrate the restoration of the capital's tallest monument.

"Today" show weatherman Al Roker, Interior Secretary Sally Jewell and "American Idol" winner Candice Glover appeared at the opening ceremony.

Public tours reopened at 1 p.m., taking visitors on a 70-second elevator ride to the top for a vista of the National Mall, the Capitol, and the Lincoln and Jefferson memorials. Visitors started waiting early in the morning.

"There are thousands of people in line waiting to get inside," said Jon Jarvis, director of the National Park Service, "and the monument is ready to receive them in all of its glory."

The 555-foot obelisk had been closed since August 2011, when a rare magnitude-5.8 earthquake chipped and unsettled some of its granite and marble stones.

Since then, crews of stonemasons filled cracks with epoxy, relined stone interstices with more than 14,000 feet of mortar and installed metal cradle anchors to reinforce the stone ribs sustaining the monument's pyramidion.

The arduous process began soon after the quake, with engineers rappelling from the top of the structure to investigate the damage, stone by stone. Ultimately, 132 chunks of stone were replaced with marble from the same Maryland quarry that produced some of the monument's original stones.

During the repair, the neoclassical-style structure was surrounded by a stylish scaffolding covered with a blue scrim that glowed at night with lighting from 488 lamps. The protective structure, designed by New York architect Michael Graves, enveloped the monument for almost a year and was praised for its blocky modernism.

"It looked like a Transformer ... but it was all lit up," said Washington resident Steven Schwark, 29. For Schwark, a social media specialist, the reopening will be an occasion to visit the top for the first time.

The reopened monument now bears visible scars — white gashes of epoxy and new pieces of marble that clash with the softer hue of the older stones.

"That stone has been weathered for more than 100 years," said James Perry, chief of resource management at the National Park Service. It has been "patched and cracked and chipped and hit by lightning. ... It's not meant to be pristine, it's meant to retain that character."

Visitors will also be treated to a new exhibit on George Washington's legacy and the history of the monument's construction. Park officials estimate that 800,000 people will come through every year.

Half of the $15 million repair bill was paid with a donation from David Rubenstein, a founder of the Carlyle Group, a private equity firm.

The monument has a history of being fashionably late. Plans to build a structure to honor George Washington were first approved by the Continental Congress in 1783, before he became the first president.

A private group pursued the idea half a century later, but when funds dried up in 1856, construction paused for 20 years. Marble was then sourced from a different quarry, causing a slight color change near the obelisk's 150-foot mark.

The monument opened to the public in 1886 but closed quickly because of vandalism. It reopened in 1888.

comments powered by Disqus
I commented on a story, but my comments aren't showing up. Why?
We provide a community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day.
Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. We expect civil dialogue.
Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome.
Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum.

If you don't see your comment, perhaps you ...
... called someone an idiot, a racist, a moron, etc. Name-calling or profanity (to include veiled profanity) will not be tolerated.
... rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.
... included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.
... accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.
... made a comment in really poor taste.

MULTIMEDIA