It's not pretty, but wheat harvest has begun

6/19/2014

By Dan Voorhis

By Dan Voorhis

The Wichita Eagle

(MCT) — Cutting has started, more or less, in southern Kansas for this year's wheat harvest.

Steve Inslee, general manager of the Kiowa Co-op, said that the southern counties haven't been quite a soggy as the Wichita area, and farmers have been able to do some cutting this week between rains.

But what farmers are finding is pretty anti-climactic.

"There's no excitement in cutting wheat this year," he said.

Farmers are coming in with yields of 10 to 20 bushels per acre, less than half a typical amount. The high, so far, is 23 bushels per acre, he said.

If it's below 10, they are not bothering to cut, he said.

Dan Cashier, general manager of Anthony Farmers Co-op, said that while the yields in Harper County are awful as well, he was surprised at how good the test weights — pounds of wheat per bushel — were. He said they were running between 57 and 62 pounds per bushel.

"They're at least marketable," he said. "But it's still not real pretty."

Much of Kansas was largely without rain between August and May, robbing wheat of the moisture it needed to grow and develop grain in the heads.

A June 1 estimate by the U.S. Department of Agriculture predicted the state's wheat harvest at 243.6 million bushels, the worst since 1989.

comments powered by Disqus
I commented on a story, but my comments aren't showing up. Why?
We provide a community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day.
Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. We expect civil dialogue.
Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome.
Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum.

If you don't see your comment, perhaps you ...
... called someone an idiot, a racist, a moron, etc. Name-calling or profanity (to include veiled profanity) will not be tolerated.
... rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.
... included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.
... accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.
... made a comment in really poor taste.

MULTIMEDIA