Beef Empire Days   BED – Entertainment   BED – Food   BED – Industry   BED – Sports Community Guide GCCC 90th Anniversary History Page SW Kansas Pro-Am Youth In Excellence
All Classifieds Jobs Real Estate Garage Sales
Southwest Life and Events Weather
Local and National SWKPrepZone.com SWKPrepZone Chat
Local and National Business News
Talk of the Town CopCasts

Bookmark and Share  Email this story | Add Your Comment  | Read (0) Comments

More protests

Published 6/24/2009 in Commentary : Editorial

Even after a deal that turned out to be a reasonable compromise, environmentalists in Kansas aren't giving up.

With an agreement clearing the way for expansion of the Sunflower Electric Power Corp. facility at Holcomb, the Sierra Club now wants the Kansas Department of Health and Environment to hold more public hearings on the plan.

But haven't we already been down that road?

In the run-up to a KDHE decision on an air-quality permit needed for the Sunflower expansion, a number of public hearings throughout Kansas gave citizens an opportunity to weigh in. They also were encouraged to submit opinions in writing.

And they did, to the point that the state surely knows the gist of opposing viewpoints in this divisive issue.

Simply put, on one side are those who believe the state must block any Sunflower expansion because of new carbon dioxide emissions linked to global warming. On the other side are supporters of clean-burning coal technology that provides power needed to meet baseload demand.

The Sierra Club thought it had prevailed in 2007 when KDHE Secretary Rod Bremby denied an air-quality permit for two Sunflower plants due to concern over CO2 emissions.

But after wrangling over the issue tied up consecutive legislative sessions, Gov. Mark Parkinson finally helped craft a palatable solution: Sunflower, which had planned two 700-megawatt plants, would be allowed to build one 895-megawatt unit.

The settlement also included a renewable energy standard requiring Kansas utilities to generate 20 percent of their power from renewable sources by 2020. All in all, a decent compromise.

But the Sierra Club now insists on having a say this time around, even though its stand -- total opposition to any expansion of Sunflower's coal-burning facility -- already is known.

While it's always good to seek public input, this particular issue has been thoroughly vetted. The public is tired of it and ready to move on.

It's time to instead focus on building an energy portfolio that works for Kansas, including exciting plans to expand renewable energy resources.

Continual bickering over the Sunflower plant won't get us any closer to that important goal.

Read These Related Stories

AP: Sierra Club wants hearing on Holcomb power plant - 6/23/2009

Add your Comment About This Story

Commenting Rules

The Garden City Telegram reserves the right to delete any comment it deems inappropriate. We encourage visitor comments and ask that you be brief and add something relevant to the conversation. All comments are reviewed (usually within 24 hours or less) before appearing on this website.

Read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use for full details of our policies.

Thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts.

 

captcha 14c9b0777c4e4793b79f2a5d0bc04978

Email This Story To a Friend
 

captcha 53d128df11ff442b99d9f95464182c4c

Found 0 comment(s)!