Beef Empire Days   BED – Event Coverage Community Guide Honor Flight SW Kansas Pro-Am Youth In Excellence View Special Section PDFs
All Classifieds Jobs Real Estate Garage Sales
Food and Recipes Letters to Santa Puzzles and Games Southwest Life and Events SWKPets Pet Blog United Way Fundraising Weather
Local and National Top 10 of 2011 Preps Live SWKPrepZone.com E-Edition
Local and National Top 10 of 2011 Business News E-Edition
Recent Videos Recent Photos Recent Podcasts Podcasts-Talk of the Town

  Add Your Comment | Read (0) Comments

Tax details

Published 3/13/2010 in Commentary : Editorial

With the cash-strapped state of Kansas looking at ways to generate revenue, such moves as raising taxes and scrapping sales tax exemptions are on the table.

To raise funds in the face of a budget shortfall of more than $400 million, a request by Gov. Mark Parkinson for lawmakers to approve a temporary, 1 percent sales tax warrants serious consideration. And higher taxes on alcohol and tobacco have merit.

Debate also has focused on singling out certain groups and organizations to lose sales tax exemptions as a way to bring in new income.

Sales tax exemptions reportedly totaled more than $4 billion in 2009 alone — more than double the amount of sales tax a state revenue estimating group predicts Kansas will collect this fiscal year.

While lawmakers need to scrutinize sales tax exemptions that have been on the books for years, choosing which to eliminate without causing more pain won't be easy.

For example, one proposal to raise an estimated $182 million in part through elimination of a sales tax exemption on residential water, electric and natural gas bills would drive up utility costs at a time many Kansans can't afford that additional burden.

With such possibilities in mind, it's no wonder Kansans want more details on the state's financial activity. Yet some pertinent information isn't available on the state's KanView Web site, created to establish transparency of state monetary matters.

A tax transparency bill introduced in the Kansas House would require the tax expenditure report, published annually by the Kansas Department of Revenue, to be included on the KanView Web site. It would feature details on indirect expenditures — including revenue the state does not collect — to help taxpayers better understand all expenditures.

Budget woes understandably will remain the center of attention in Topeka as the economic fallout continues to threaten schools, social service agencies and individuals. Taxpayers will want to know even more about how governments handle their money.

State lawmakers should help satisfy that interest by supporting a tax transparency bill that would improve the KanView Web site and give Kansans an even clearer picture of what's going on.

Add your Comment About This Story

Commenting Rules

The Garden City Telegram reserves the right to delete any comment it deems inappropriate. We encourage visitor comments and ask that you be brief and add something relevant to the conversation. All comments are reviewed (usually within 24 hours or less) before appearing on this website.

Read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use for full details of our policies.

Thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts.

 

captcha d209ffbc14ad43c583b7250aa80451e1

Found 0 comment(s)!