Beef Empire Days   BED – Event Coverage Community Guide Honor Flight SW Kansas Pro-Am Youth In Excellence View Special Section PDFs
All Classifieds Jobs Real Estate Garage Sales
Food and Recipes Letters to Santa Puzzles and Games Southwest Life and Events SWKPets Pet Blog United Way Fundraising Weather
Local and National Top 10 of 2011 Preps Live SWKPrepZone.com E-Edition
Local and National Top 10 of 2011 Business News E-Edition
Recent Videos Recent Photos Recent Podcasts Podcasts-Talk of the Town

  Add Your Comment | Read (0) Comments

Poor attempt

Published 2/8/2010 in Commentary : Editorial

Many Kansas lawmakers have been firmly against a statewide ban on smoking in public places.

So with pressure to pursue as much — polls show a majority of Kansans favor public smoking restrictions — it's no surprise that a less-than-sincere attempt has emerged.

The bill, HB 2642, supposedly calls for a statewide ban on smoking in public places, but would allow smoking inside places with ventilated rooms, and with smoking and nonsmoking sections — both proven failures in protecting nonsmokers from secondhand smoke.

Also, hospitality establishments would be able to pay a fee to allow smoking.

The goal of a public smoking ban should be simple: Protecting all workers and business patrons from secondhand smoke linked to heart disease and other serious ailments.

HB 2642 falls well short. And one of its worst aspects is that it would prohibit local communities, Garden City included, from having a smoking ban stricter than the statewide law.

In Garden City, smoking is prohibited in all restaurants, bars, private clubs/fraternal organizations, educational facilities and public seating areas such as bleachers — sensible guidelines intended to protect all workers and patrons from secondhand smoke.

The more stringent approach has worked here and in other Kansas communities with comprehensive bans, and without the financial fallout some predicted.

Some businesses even have posted gains as more nonsmokers choose to patronize their smoke-free operations. A drive past popular gathering spots in Garden City often shows packed parking lots.

Forcing any community that has had success with its own ordinance to take a step backward would be unreasonable and unfair.

Calling the bill a "fraud," Gov. Mark Parkinson has promised a veto. He favors a Senate-passed measure to ban smoking statewide in most public places, including restaurants and bars.

But even that proposal offers unnecessary exemptions, including casinos — some of which, incidentally, will be state-owned.

Government-mandated regulations intended to keep people safe aren't implemented on a pick-and-choose basis, and a public smoking ban shouldn't be, either.

Until lawmakers acknowledge as much, they should steer clear of a statewide ban and let communities like Garden City move forward with ordinances that work.

Add your Comment About This Story

Commenting Rules

The Garden City Telegram reserves the right to delete any comment it deems inappropriate. We encourage visitor comments and ask that you be brief and add something relevant to the conversation. All comments are reviewed (usually within 24 hours or less) before appearing on this website.

Read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use for full details of our policies.

Thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts.

 

captcha bc4077220eae42ab805bdc18210a252b

Found 0 comment(s)!