Beef Empire Days   BED – Entertainment   BED – Food   BED – Industry   BED – Sports Community Guide GCCC 90th Anniversary History Page SW Kansas Pro-Am Youth In Excellence
All Classifieds Jobs Real Estate Garage Sales
Southwest Life and Events Weather
Local and National SWKPrepZone.com SWKPrepZone Chat
Local and National Business News
Talk of the Town CopCasts

Bookmark and Share  Email this story | Add Your Comment  | Read (0) Comments

What they're saying

Published 6/26/2009 in Commentary : Editorial

Los Angeles Times, on health care reform:

Legislation to overhaul the U.S. healthcare system hasn't emerged from congressional committees, yet it has gained enough momentum for the demonization of the reform effort to start in earnest. ...

There are three fundamental and interrelated problems with healthcare in this country: It's too expensive, the results aren't as good as in other countries, and the insurance provided by government and the private sector leaves too many people uncovered. ...

The cost, quality and coverage problems are intertwined. Healthcare providers pass along the expense of caring for the uninsured and underinsured, raising costs for those who have insurance. Insurers respond by raising prices, which leads more employers and individuals to drop coverage. The low reimbursement rates prompt physicians to move into more lucrative careers as specialists, reducing the supply of the primary-care doctors who are vital to timely, high-quality care. And the perverse financial incentives in the system deter doctors and hospitals from aligning their interests with those of their patients. After all, the healthcare industry profits more from treating ailments than from preventing them. ...

The U.S. healthcare system isn't a failure. It's extraordinarily good at some things, such as developing new treatments. But its inefficiencies and gaps have created flaws so deep, the system cannot be sustained for long. ...

The (Norfolk) Virginian-Pilot, on President Obama, public records and transparency:

President Barack Obama, who made a pledge to bring greater transparency to government during his administration, needs to implement that philosophy at the door to his new home.

In a disturbing echo of his predecessor's approach to public records, the Obama administration recently rejected two requests for access to White House visitor logs maintained by the Secret Service.

MSNBC had asked for a list of all visitors since Jan. 20, and the watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington had requested logs of visits by coal company executives. In response to the rejection, CREW has filed a lawsuit in federal court.

Administration officials say they're reviewing the policy on visitor logs but, for now, they're adhering to the Bush-era stance that the official record of visitors is not subject to the Freedom of Information Act.

Transparency, as Obama has said many times, enhances public understanding of government actions and serves as a safeguard against corruption. The concept applies to the White House. It is the people's house, and the people have a right to know who's inside.

Add your Comment About This Story

Commenting Rules

The Garden City Telegram reserves the right to delete any comment it deems inappropriate. We encourage visitor comments and ask that you be brief and add something relevant to the conversation. All comments are reviewed (usually within 24 hours or less) before appearing on this website.

Read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use for full details of our policies.

Thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts.

 

captcha 38daebd560e6496e9ffc636e90cbbdf9

Email This Story To a Friend
 

captcha fda8b9c0ed51461dbe68a40973013cd0

Found 0 comment(s)!